Article Navigation
- < Previous
- Next >
Journal Article
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Volume 107, Issue 10, October 2015, djv296, https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djv296
Published:
30 September 2015
- Split View
- Views
- Article contents
- Figures & tables
- Video
- Audio
- Supplementary Data
-
Cite
Cite
Sue Rochman, Study Finds Black Women Have Denser Breast Tissue Than White Women, JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Volume 107, Issue 10, October 2015, djv296, https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djv296
Close
Search
Close
Search
Advanced Search
Search Menu
A study using a new tool to measure mammographic density found that black women have denser breast tissue than white women. The findings add to the research on breast density, cancer disparities, and risk-based screening.
Breast density refers to the amount of fibroglandular tissue in the breast when observed on a mammogram. Dense breast tissue shows up white on a mammogram, as do cancer cells, making it difficult for the radiologist to spot a tumor. About half of all women who have screening mammography are found to have dense breast tissue. About 40% of these women have heterogeneously dense breast tissue and about 10% have extremely dense breast tissue.
Breast density also serves as an independent predictor of breast cancer risk. Women with heterogeneously dense breast tissue have about a 1.2 times greater risk of developing breast cancer than that of women with average breast density. Women with extremely dense breast tissue have about twice the risk.
Studies comparing breast density between black women and white women have had mixed results. For the new study, researchers quantified breast density on mammography images from 1,589 black women and 1,256 white women by using a validated, publicly available, automated software algorithm called LIBRA (Laboratory for Individualized Breast Radiodensity Measurement) developed at the University of Pennsylvania. ( http://www.cbica.upenn.edu/sbia/software/LIBRA/ ) The analysis controlled for other known breast cancer risk factors, including body mass index, prior biopsy, age at menarche, menopause status, family history, age at first birth, and use of menopausal hormone therapy.
Black women had statistically significantly higher absolute breast area density (40.1cm 2 ) than white women (33.1cm 2 ). Black women also had statistically significantly higher volumetric density (263.1cm 3 ) than white women (181.6cm 3 ). The findings were presented in April in a poster session at the 2015 annual meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research in Philadelphia.
“We know that it’s harder to see a tumor on mammography in women with dense breasts, but we don’t know the underlying biology that causes women with high density to be at higher risk for breast cancer,” said Anne Marie McCarthy, Ph.D., research fellow at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, who presented the study. “We want to get a better sense of the underlying biology of density and how we can perhaps use a better measurement for breast density to predict breast cancer risk.”
Anne Marie McCarthy, Ph.D.
Open in new tabDownload slide
Lisa Newman, M.D., surgical oncologist and director of the Breast Care Center at the University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center in Ann Arbor, studies breast cancer in black women in the United States and in Ghana, Africa. Newman called the findings thought-provoking, noting the paucity of data on mammographic patterns in large cohorts of black and white U.S. women. Newman also said that additional studies would need to replicate the findings in other patient populations before the results could be generalized to black women in this country and internationally.
The American Cancer Society estimates that 231,840 women will be diagnosed with—and 40,290 will die of—breast cancer this year. Studies have found that in women older than 45 years, black women have a lower incidence of breast cancer but a higher mortality. The overall 5-year relative survival rate for breast cancer diagnosed between 2002 and 2008
was 90% for white women and 78% for black women. In women younger than 45 years, both incidence and mortality from breast cancer are higher in black women than in white women. Black women also are more likely to be diagnosed with an advanced-stage tumor, a factor in their lower overall survival. However, stage for stage, survival is lower for black women than white women.
Researchers are studying how social and economic factors contribute to these disparities. Those factors include access to mammographic screening and quality health care, as well as reproductive patterns, such as age at menarche, age at first birth, and breastfeeding. They also are looking at how reproductive, environmental, and genetic factors may contribute to biological variations in breast tumors found in black women and white women. Black women are more likely than white women to be diagnosed with tumors that have a higher grade and are not hormone sensitive. Black women also are at higher risk than white women of being diagnosed with a triple-negative or basal-like breast tumor, subtypes that tend to be more aggressive.
Determining the basis for these disparities is not easy. Racial identities are not discrete categories but rather social constructs. In cancer research, Newman said, “race often acts as a surrogate for characteristics that are more prevalent among minority populations, such as poverty and suboptimal nutrition or dietary habits. Because these characteristics are linked to cancer risk, they can also be confounders in studies of cancer disparities.” Newman said genotyping studies now under way “that can quantify extent of geographically defined ancestral background” could yield more insights into race, hereditary risk, and cancer risk.
Breast density research is being fueled, in part, by laws—passed in 22 states to date—requiring doctors to inform women who have mammography screening whether they have dense breast tissue and should consider supplemental screening. However, no evidence-based guidelines exist on what, if any, supplemental screening women with dense breast tissue should have.
“There is an effort to develop risk-based screening guidelines and an attempt to identify the women who may benefit from supplemental or earlier screening,” said Carol Lee, M.D., a diagnostic radiologist at Memorial Sloan–Kettering Cancer Center in New York. “Density is a very complicated issue. Asian women tend to have denser breasts than white women, but they have a lower breast incidence—so regardless of density there are a lot of different factors to what constitutes risk that we still know very little about.”
The software algorithm the researchers used “is validated only for research, so there are no direct clinical applications at this time,” McCarthy said. “We hope that it will inform more research exploring to what extent breast density mediates breast cancer risk and breast cancer outcomes. If we do find there are racial differences in density and that these differences are associated with differences in risk or outcome, then there are implications for who needs supplemental screening.”
© Oxford University Press 2015.
Download all slides
Advertisem*nt
Citations
Views
44,317
Altmetric
More metrics information
Metrics
Total Views 44,317
43,788 Pageviews
529 PDF Downloads
Since 11/1/2016
Month: | Total Views: |
---|---|
November 2016 | 2 |
December 2016 | 1 |
January 2017 | 8 |
February 2017 | 11 |
March 2017 | 8 |
April 2017 | 1 |
May 2017 | 13 |
June 2017 | 3 |
July 2017 | 4 |
August 2017 | 3 |
September 2017 | 3 |
October 2017 | 14 |
November 2017 | 6 |
December 2017 | 117 |
January 2018 | 236 |
February 2018 | 320 |
March 2018 | 475 |
April 2018 | 361 |
May 2018 | 595 |
June 2018 | 699 |
July 2018 | 622 |
August 2018 | 613 |
September 2018 | 663 |
October 2018 | 483 |
November 2018 | 705 |
December 2018 | 749 |
January 2019 | 558 |
February 2019 | 584 |
March 2019 | 588 |
April 2019 | 580 |
May 2019 | 669 |
June 2019 | 560 |
July 2019 | 555 |
August 2019 | 520 |
September 2019 | 484 |
October 2019 | 728 |
November 2019 | 394 |
December 2019 | 343 |
January 2020 | 352 |
February 2020 | 357 |
March 2020 | 294 |
April 2020 | 455 |
May 2020 | 287 |
June 2020 | 358 |
July 2020 | 284 |
August 2020 | 264 |
September 2020 | 241 |
October 2020 | 324 |
November 2020 | 292 |
December 2020 | 305 |
January 2021 | 291 |
February 2021 | 348 |
March 2021 | 377 |
April 2021 | 322 |
May 2021 | 325 |
June 2021 | 406 |
July 2021 | 445 |
August 2021 | 509 |
September 2021 | 505 |
October 2021 | 743 |
November 2021 | 605 |
December 2021 | 634 |
January 2022 | 549 |
February 2022 | 663 |
March 2022 | 818 |
April 2022 | 838 |
May 2022 | 819 |
June 2022 | 581 |
July 2022 | 642 |
August 2022 | 576 |
September 2022 | 599 |
October 2022 | 778 |
November 2022 | 744 |
December 2022 | 749 |
January 2023 | 885 |
February 2023 | 887 |
March 2023 | 947 |
April 2023 | 832 |
May 2023 | 1,316 |
June 2023 | 921 |
July 2023 | 1,095 |
August 2023 | 960 |
September 2023 | 836 |
October 2023 | 847 |
November 2023 | 590 |
December 2023 | 479 |
January 2024 | 525 |
February 2024 | 538 |
March 2024 | 572 |
April 2024 | 413 |
May 2024 | 409 |
June 2024 | 308 |
Email alerts
Article activity alert
Advance article alerts
New issue alert
Receive exclusive offers and updates from Oxford Academic
Citing articles via
Google Scholar
-
Latest
-
Most Read
-
Most Cited
More from Oxford Academic
Medicine and Health
Books
Journals
Lincoln, Nebraska
Pittsburg, Pennsylvania
Burlington, Vermont
Long Island, New York
Advertisem*nt